Department of Health

Website of the Department of Health

Please note that this website has a UK government access keys system.

You are here:

The use of viagra (sildenafil) in the treatment of impotence (erectile dysfunction) : Advice from the Standing Medical Advisory Committee (SMAC), November 1998

  • Document type:
    Publication
  • Author:
    Department of Health
  • Published date:
    1 November 1998
  • Primary audience:
    Professionals
  • Publication format:
    Electronic only
  • Gateway reference:
    Not required
  • Copyright holder:
    Crown copyright

In July Ministers asked SMAC to advise them on the introduction of sildenafil into use in the NHS for the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction.

On 29 July I wrote offering SMAC's interim advice, which was cited by the NHS Executive in its interim guidance to the NHS in mid-September when sildenafil was licensed.In August SMAC convened a working group to help prepare considered advice. This group included a range of experts working in the field of erectile dysfunction. It received from researchers in the University of Birmingham a detailed assessment of the available evidence, on which the group also questioned the manufacturers whose co-operation we acknowledge. SMAC itself, whose members are representative of the whole of the medical profession, then distilled from the many views expressed in the group the key clinical factors we believe are relevant to Ministers' consideration of the wider issues this drug raises.

EFFECTIVENESS OF SILDENAFIL

Sildenafil is effective in restoring normal sexual function in the majority of men with erectile dysfunction, and as an oral treatment is likely to be more acceptable than injections or mechanical devices and is cheaper. The health benefit is an improvement in quality of life, for the man and his partner, and the extent of this will vary according to the predisposing condition, severity and effects of his erectile dysfunction. This adds to the difficulty of calculating the benefits eg in Quality Adjusted Life Years. There may be an additional health benefit if sildenafil encourages earlier presentation with erectile dysfunction leading to earlier diagnosis and treatment of predisposing conditions (eg diabetes), of which erectile dysfunction may be the first symptom. There is also anecdotal evidence that men without erectile dysfunction may benefit from improved erections, but trials were not designed to answer this question; it cannot be considered a health benefit and should not be prescribed in these circumstances.

DIAGNOSIS OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION

Diagnosis of erectile dysfunction depends on self-reporting, so it may be difficult to avoid additional costs for men who do not have erectile dysfunction and who wish try to enhance normal performance. There will also be opportunity costs of the time spent in consultations in primary care and clinics in secondary care, both for men and their partners, and financial and/or opportunity costs of training NHS staff. The workload of the medical professions likely to increase whether erectile dysfunction is assessed (and sildenafil is prescribed) in secondary or in primary care. Indeed the scale of demand and importance of full clinical assessment mean that substantial medical time must be devoted to consultations, whether NHS or private. GPs often have the advantage of already knowing the patient's history and so are in a good position to make the initial assessment, with further investigation by hospital specialists as required. American experience suggests that the number of new patients will decline then stabilise after an initial period of high demand. Many patients already receiving hospital-based care (eg for diabetes or neurological disease) may have their erectile dysfunction assessed as part of the management of their disease.

TARGETING

We considered whether NHS treatment for erectile dysfunction could successfully be targeted at men with the greatest clinical need. We identified three broad aspects that might offer clinically relevant criteria: predisposing condition, severity and effect.

  • Predisposing condition.     
    Sildenafil is effective in treating erectile dysfunction whatever the predisposing clinical condition, although the degree of effectiveness varies from some 43% for radical prostatectomy to 83% for spinal cord injury. However it is important that any such condition is identified before sildenafil is prescribed because erectile dysfunction may be a symptom of a chronic or progressive physical or psychiatric disease which needs treatment and which may remain undetected if the erectile dysfunction alone were successfully treated. Erectile dysfunction also may be a side-effect of some drug treatments for chronic conditions; in some circumstances it may be possible to change to a drug which has less effect on erectile function, in others sildenafil may help a patient maintain compliance by counteracting the erectile dysfunction side-effect eg of a regime of antipsychotics. Where erectile dysfunction follows acute interventions eg radical prostatectomy, management should be part of follow-up care. We noted that the incidence of erectile dysfunction increases with age and that it is difficult to distinguish between the effects of age and of an organic predisposing condition.
  • Severity of erectile dysfunction.     
    There are no practical and reliable means of measuring severity objectively. The simplest measure is the percentage of occasions on which erection is inadequate for penetration or completion of sexual intercourse (eg 50% or 75%) over a specific period (eg 3 months), but this must depend on self-reporting, and once the criteria are public knowledge patients will be tempted to say the correct words to obtain the drug. Doctors' assessments of their patients will be influenced by their knowledge of each patient and of any predisposing condition; but cannot avoid a subjective element.
  • Effect of erectile dysfunction.     
    Some men and their partners tolerate severe erectile dysfunction well; others will be severely distressed by mild erectile dysfunction. Assessments of clinical need should take account of psychological effect as well as severity and predisposing condition. Assessments should also take account of the effect on the partner of a resumption of penetrative intercourse: for premenopausal women, consideration of contraception; for postmenopausal women, consideration of dyspareunia.

These criteria should, in principle, enable doctors to place patients on a continuum of need. However we identified no obvious break-points, or step-changes, in this continuum; and no easy means of measurement of need and therefore of health benefit.

DOSE, FREQUENCY, DURATION AND FOLLOW-UP

The cost-effectiveness of prescribing depends on cost which, for an individual patient, depends on dose, frequency and duration of prescribing (as well as price).

  • Dose.     
    We have seen no reason to question the manufacturer's recommendation that starting prescription should normally be 50mg doses.
  • Frequency of use.     
    Sildenafil is unusual in that there appears to be no clinical reason to restrict the number of tablets (up to one a day) prescribed to an individual in any given period. However limiting the levels of prescribing may reduce NHS costs more than it reduces the public health benefit; and we note the research evidence that the average frequency of sexual intercourse in the 40 - 60 age range is once a week.
  • Duration and follow-up.     
    Experience to date suggests sildenafil can safely be prescribed throughout life provided that this is within the terms of the summary of product characteristics in the marketing authorisation (which specifies contraindications and a starting age of 18). However the frequency of contra-indications increases with age, and SMAC is particularly concerned that prolonged prescribing could mask the progression of serious underlying disease. Some psychological causes of erectile dysfunction resolve spontaneously or with treatment, so the need for and tolerance of sildenafil should be reassessed at 1-3 months. Thereafter the appropriateness of prescribing should normally be checked yearly, but stopped immediately if interacting drugs have to be prescribed for other conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

(i)     SMAC recognises that the aim of prescribing sildenafil is to correct the distressing condition of erectile dysfunction so that sexual function returns towards normal . In common with many treatments available under the NHS this improves quality of life, but does not save or prolong it.

(ii)     Provided that sildenafil is prescribed only to patients who have the medical condition of erectile dysfunction, SMAC sees no medical reason why it should not be available on the NHS in accordance with the terms of the summary of product characteristics in the marketing authorisation; nor why it should not be prescribed by GPs with referral to hospital specialists where appropriate.

(iii)     SMAC suggests that Ministers should consider the priority to be given to all methods of managing erectile dysfunction within the NHS relative to treatments for other conditions, but that any decision take into account equity of access as well as availability of resources. Doctors will need clear Government support and national guidance.

(iv)     Once Ministers have decided in principle on the prescribing of sildenafil, SMAC would be happy if so requested to prepare appropriate clinical guidance for doctors.

Additional links

Ordering publications

Contact details for obtaining hard-copy DH publications.

Help viewing PDFs

Help viewing PDFs

Useful tips to ensure you get the most from PDFs and the free Reader program. Topics covered include accessibility, troubleshooting and searching files.

Access keys